Who doesn't love a good summer rerun? I had a tough week or two. So I need a break. Not that anyone cares. And I sort of miss Lo Hai Qu. I haven't seen her for a while. Lo has always been my favorite voice, but she hasn't been seen lately. My theory is that she was kidnapped by aliens, or Natural Wine producers, which amounts to the same thing.
For those of you new here who haven't met her, Lo Hai Qu emerged from my dyspeptic brain because Joe Roberts, 1WineDoody, had an intern at the time, Shelby Vittek, who is now doing an abysmal job at Terroirist.com. She's like the librarian who always recommends Tom Clancy novels. I decided that if 1WineDoody had an intern, the HoseMaster needed an intern. Coincidentally, or was it Fate, I was watching the CBS Evening News with my gorgeous wife and there was a news story about China that mentioned a government official named Hai Qu. I said to my wife, "Wouldn't it be funny if his name was Lo Hai Qu?" And suddenly, unbidden but nearly fully formed, Lo Hai Qu came into my life.
This is her very first appearance on HoseMaster of Wine™. I won a worthless Wine Blog Award for this piece. I hadn't read it in three years before I decided to rerun it today, and as much as I like the concept (me using my Voice, the HoseMaster, who is in turn channeling a young woman's Voice--very meta), I hate how about two-thirds through I go back to my HoseMaster voice. I must have been in a hurry to finish it. I know Lo Hai Qu will one day return. In some very strange, borderline sick, way, I actually love her.
Here, from March of 2013, is the debut of my crazy and beloved Lo Hai Qu. Original introduction included:
I’ve turned this HoseMaster of Wine™
post over to my intern, Lo Hai Qu. It’s Lo’s job to catalog all the
samples I receive for review, primarily wine, but a surprising amount of
urine as well (Were it not for Lo, I’d probably mistake the latter for
orange wines because they tend to have nicer labels). Lo also answers
the phone, occasionally when it’s actually ringing, responds to my
voluminous fan mail with prepaid restraining orders (I’m talking to you,
Leslie Sbrocco and Jenna Talia Baiocchi), and massages my funny bone.
Lo works voluntarily, and not because I lock her in a soundproofed room
hidden underneath my Castello di Amorosa torture chamber replica dressed
as Natalie MacLean and tied to a water bed filled with New Zealand
Sauvignon Blanc. Ah, but I do love the smell of cat pee in the morning.
Lo Hai Qu has some thoughts about wine and wine critics, and how Millennials differ from us old fucks.
Establishment wine critics are dead to me. I spent last week sending
condolence cards to the people they left behind. “Sorry, Mrs. Parker,
for your loss. You must be devastated. As for me, I never read
The Wine Advocate,
so, on the 100 Point Scale, my sadness is a 78—unctuous, with overtones
of Schadenfreude.” “Dear Mrs. Laube, I can only imagine your grief. I’m
sure Jim has gone on to a better place. I hear Hell is lovely this time
of year. And there’s all the Lodi Zin he can drink.” “Dear Mrs.
Heimoff, you must be Steve’s Mom. All the best. Please tattoo ‘I was
wrong about Social Media’ on Steve before they drop him in the dirt
hole. It’s comforting to know he’s met his final terroir.”
Me and my friends that like wine, we don’t care what wine experts think
about wine. Since when do you need more than five years to understand
anything? Medical school is like only four years, right? And you let
those people poke stuff into you. Bartending school is only a few
months, and then they make hella good drinks. How long is beauty school?
And those geniuses have scissors near your neck. So, my point is, once
you’ve spent a few years liking wine, the first thing you learn is it’s
all a game. Everything you can learn from those old creeps you can learn
from your friends on FaceBook, and the experts who write those cool
wine blogs (not like the asswipe who writes this one)
who have actually written about wine, ON THEIR OWN BLOG, for like years. Like I could see myself paying money for a subscription to
Wine Spectator
when I’m still living at home because the same generation you want me
to listen to talk about wine is the generation who made this fucked-up
world where I can’t get a job that pays more than $12/hour. Yeah, that
makes sense.
So, you ask, when I want to learn about wine, or when I want advice on
what wines I should buy, where do I go for that advice? I don’t go to
those crusty old turds who write for established wine magazines. My
friends and me, we don’t care about points. We don’t know what points
mean. Points aren’t a conversation. Like Twitter, that’s a conversation!
LOL, IMHO, MILF.
#WINECRITICCORPSE. See? So if I want to know
what to buy, I go on FaceBook, because the combined opinions of 40
people with an average of two years of wine experience is 80 years of
wine experience! Who the hell has 80 years of wine experience? The Queen
of fucking England, Elton John? And it’s 80 years of wine experience
for free. This is the key word for Millennials, you dying old wine
critics, “Free.” We like free. It’s why we invented the Internet, so we
could get free stuff 24 hours a day—music, movies, pornography—which you
idiots always paid for! We’re the smartest generation ever. So we
expect free wine advice, too. And if you won’t give it to us, we’ll just
make it up. It’s worked for Truth on the Internet, why won’t it work
for wine?
Maybe the confusion, to be serious for a moment, comes from the
definition of “wine expert.” In the old days, people had to spend years
and years studying wine, taste thousands of wines every year to fine
tune their palate, taste the “great wines” as often as possible in order
to understand how high the bar is set, travel to wine regions and taste
rigorously, keep notebooks filled with tasting notes, and read
extensively on the subject from books written by acknowledged and
respected wine writers. Eventually, you’d be thought of as a “wine
expert.” That is so last century. I’m only 28, and I know like at least
50 wine experts! Not one is over 35! How do I know they’re wine experts?
They have a blog. They not only wait tables, do the schedules and lock
the doors of the restaurant at night, they’re the Sommelier! They go to
wine tastings at the local wine shop and taste every single wine every
time and
THEY DON’T NEED TO SPIT! Some have tasted more than a
hundred wines under $25. These people know wine. Plus, they’re not old
and their advice is free. Why wouldn’t I listen to them?
Don’t feel picked on, Old, Dead Wine Critics. We just prefer the voice
of the crowd to give us what we need rather than the solitary voice of a
professional critic, whether it’s movies, restaurants, wine or
opinions. We like to share all those things with our friends, it’s just
more fun and if one of us looks stupid, we all look stupid! Why in the
world would I listen to a wine critic who costs money when I can go to
CellarTracker and read what forty strangers have to say about a wine?
This is how you learn! It’s just like in school when you passed a test
because you copied the answers of the stranger sitting next to you!
Hell, he has to be smarter than you are, he wrote down an answer! Same
thing with CellarTracker. This is time-proven wisdom.
Millennials, we are so done with so-called wine “gatekeepers.” Why?
Mostly because we don’t even know where the gate is. But, also, we have
each other. And, as I’ve shown, we’re the smartest generation ever.
We’ll never get tired of FaceBook or Twitter. We’ll never stop Yelping.
We love Yelp! Where else can you go to find out what people with no
class think about stuff they don’t know anything about? Except FOX News?
Wine criticism is changing because we want to be the wine critics! And
when that happens, when the old fucks writing today are finally done,
retired or dead, then everyone will be a wine expert because they know
their own taste—like you can be your own doctor because you know your
own body. It’s the same thing! Believe me, Millennials are every bit as
good at writing impenetrably and meaninglessly about wine and wine
criticism as any other generation. If anything, we’re even better.
2 comments:
Ron--she got better over time. Maybe the Hi triumphed over the Lo Q. I hope she has more to say. A voice like hers comes along once in a blue moon.
Bob,
Lo seems to have gotten lost in my twisted mind. It's been Trump and Larry Anosmia, and maybe a new voice that seems inside me. But I know that Lo will be back. She's absolutely my favorite. I'd forgotten that in this first piece I assigned her an age--28! In my head, she's about 23. So I might just change that. Truthfully, though, to me she is ageless.
It's genuinely scary how real Lo is to me. I often expect her to walk into my house for work. Could happen...
Post a Comment